The Straits Times has reported on the issue today:
Nature lovers fear coral project will cause damage, But NParks says it is not true that artificial reef structures harm the environment by Shobana Kesava, Straits Times 26 Nov 07;
Some excerpts from the report...
National Parks Board (NParks) spokesman George Tay said: 'The project is not harming the environment, since the artificial reef and garden sit on the sea floor, away from the natural coral reef zone of the nature reserve.'
Asked about the structures on the shore, their creator, a volunteer on the SP team, Mr Charles Rowe, said that was where the team has been building them since March last year. When completed, they are moved out to sea.
Captain Frederick Francis, who heads the SP volunteer team, confirmed that the team had been asked by NParks to remove the structures from the beach. He maintained that the structures were not damaging marine life, and that sea grasses and algae can be seen growing on the beach.
Professor Leo Tan, former chief of NParks, said, while those trying to do good for the environment should not be discouraged, experiments should be monitored more closely, with NParks, scientists and sociologists working with them.
Prof Tan, himself a marine biologist, said: 'The only way to find the right technique to regenerate corals is to conduct experiments like this, but the project's methodology has to be made clear and follow-through must go on for up to 10 years before we know if an experiment is a success.
'Projects should not just be praised at the outset and forgotten.'Here are some further updates on what was seen on the shores following the
earlier post about large debris on Labrador.
I had raised the issue about the concrete slabs on Labrador to Singapore Polytechnic on 30 Oct. More than a week later, the slabs were still on the shore.
Seen on Labrador's intertidal shore on 11 Nov 07 (Sun) :
One large triangular slab (about 2.5m on each side) near the high shore.
And two large rectangular slabs (about 2m x 6m) at the low-water mark near the jetty legs, but not under the jetty. One of the two rectangular slabs was under water even at moderate low tide. All three slabs appeared to comprise of PVC pipes with plastic sheeting attached to the pipes with cable ties and ropes, and a layer of concrete between the pipes.
Are these rectangular slabs the "
two larger moulds to build it" mentioned in the ST article of 26 Nov?
So the seacils (the triangular slabs) were built
on the intertidal? This zone of the intertidal is generally only exposed for a 1-2 hours for super low spring tide that happens only 3-4 days a month. And this low tide is usually not during daylight. It seems a rather odd place to "build" seacils.
The ST article mentions that "
that was where the team has been building them since March last year. When completed, they are moved out to sea." So after the seacils are built on the intertidal, these large and heavy structures are moved out to sea over the lower reef flats and the reef crest to a subtidal area? How was this done without dragging the large heavy structure over seagrasses and corals already on the shore?
And if the rectangular slabs are where the seacils were built, why was a seacil left on the high shore near the entrance to the beach since early this year? Here is a wide view of the two rectangular slabs (left side of the photo, under the jetty), with the location of the triangular slab in circled in white near the entrance to the shore.
Seen on 25 Nov 07 (Sun): The same three slabs were still there. But some had the PVC pipes removed.
This is what the triangular slab looked like on 11 Nov (Sun).
And what it looked like on 25 Nov (Sun).
The PVC pipes on the edges of and across the slab had been removed by cutting away the ropes and cable ties. The concrete slab and its component parts remained on the shore.
Without the PVC edges, the slab is starting to disintegrate.
As the component parts of the slab break off, these will soon litter the shore.
Pieces of string will entangle animals and plants. Plastic sheeting will envelope animals and plants. Heavy chunks, as they move up and down with the tides and the waves, will rub away at the seagrasses and other marine life on the shore.
One of the rectangular slabs also had its PVC pipes removed from the edges and centre by cutting away the cable ties and ropes.
But the concrete slab remained on the shore.
Again, the components could be seen: plastic sheeting, netting and various bits of rope and ties.
The rectangular slab furthest away from the shore still had its PVC pipes.
The rectangular slabs are right next to a large patch of Sickle seagrass (
Thalassia hemprichii).
Sickle seagrass is relatively rare, even on the famous seagrass meadow at Chek Jawa.
Labrador has the largest Sickle seagrass patch on the mainland.
According to the ST article: "
Captain Frederick Francis maintained that the structures were not damaging marine life, and that sea grasses and algae can be seen growing on the beach."
Seagrasses cannot grow UNDER the slabs. Does the presence of seagrasses on the shore mean that there has been no damage to the shore? What is the current seagrass cover compared to the period BEFORE the slabs were put in place? Does the study team have data to show that seagrass cover has not been affected?
Other debris seen on the shore on 25 Nov 07 (Sun)
Long lengths of PVC pipes loose on the shore. Moving up and down with the tides and the waves.
And the signboard for an experiment, that previously was seen nailed up on the jetty. Now lying on the shore.
Labrador shore is currently under severe stress from the massive construction going right on the shore.
There has recently also been several landslides on the shore.
It's a pity that the struggling marine life also has to cope with large slabs of concrete that will soon start to fragment and abrade the shore.
And just as we were leaving, we saw the piles of PVC pipes left lying right at the gate to Labrador shore.
As the sign says, Labrador is the
ONLY mainland shore accessible for various uses.
Those who are environmentally aware will surely agree that everyone who uses Labrador shore should abide with the spirit of the NParks sign and do their part to conserve the shore.
Updates on interaction with Singapore Polytechnic on the issue:On 30 Oct, I sent an email to Singapore Polytechnic Corp Comms informing them that I had
posted photos of large debris on Labrador and asking two questions:
(a) Are the equipment depicted in my photos related to any projects by Singapore Polytechnic?
(b) What steps have been put in place to ensure that Cpt Francis' project as outlined in the ST article does not result in damage to Labrador? (
Undersea garden takes root S'pore Poly team creates marine site off Labrador for corals to regrow by Shobana Kesava Straits Times 29 Oct 07)
On 7 Nov, Singapore Polytechnic suggested a meeting to discuss the issue. I replied that I would only attend if I was not required to agree to non-disclosure of the meeting's discussions.
On 21 Nov, when I asked about the meeting, I was informed that it was decided not to have the meeting and that the issues I raised had been addressed in the interview by Straits Times with Cpt Francis.
On 21 Nov, I also offered to give Singapore Polytechnic a free public talk about our shores to SP staff and students. I was informed that I would first have to submit my presentation materials for submission to SP management to review. I have offered them a CD of the entire presentation. I am currently awaiting their response to this offer.
On 26 Nov, I also emailed Singapore Polytechnic about the issues mentioned in this blog entry.
Share your thoughts?If you have thoughts or questions about the issue that you would like to raise with Singapore Polytechnic, the person I have been communicating with on this is Kenny Chua
kennychua@sp.edu.sg Kenny has been very helpful and nice so please be gentle in your comments. You might also want to send it to the
Singapore Poly feedback form on their website (although it didn't work when I tried using it for my first submission).
MORE detailsLarge versions of
all photos of these slabs have been posted to flickr.
More about the
Labrador marine life you could see in the past.
See also
photos of Labrador marine life during happier times.
Also discussed on these forumsclubsnap forumsgscuba forum (login required)
fins online forumtomorrow.sgthe singapore dailyNUS facebookOther posts about the issueLabrador Park seashore enviroment ... with CONCRETE?!! on the justindive blog
Is the Labrador talk really that cheap?another view of someone who attended Cpt Francis' briefing on the justindive blog
Other points of viewTalk is cheap! on the moment in time blog
The Seacil reef of blog ignorance on the(new)mediaslut e-zine
Links to moreArtificial Reef Revitalises Marine Life by Kwang Wei TJAN and Lay Leng TAN on the Innovation Magazine website: Singapore researchers and volunteers lay down artificial reefs to create thriving marine ecosystems.
The little creek next to Labrador, just opposite Sentosa, where the bright lights shine on reclamation work for the Integrated Resort. The manly members were out in deeper waters dealing with a massive tangle of nets.
Meanwhile, the ladies were seriously dealing with a net that had an anchoring tyre well embedded in the sand.
A lot of digging and dragging was involved.
But it's no problem for the tough gals!
Meanwhile, the guys make three trips dragging up portions of the mega mess.
It's tough trying to drag nets equal to your body weight across rocks and on soft mud.
And there just SO MUCH of it. Closer examination shows there are several very long nets abandoned out there in a huge tangle. Andy rightly called it the Mother of All Driftnets.
The guys rescued one trapped horseshoe crab, a very large one, probably a female because of her size. But there were several in the net that were already dead.
After dragging the nets off the flats, there was still the tricky bit of getting them up the sea wall. Fortunately, Michelle brought a long rope!
Some tying up and a quick pull, the nets were hauled right up to the shore where they could no longer harm sea creatures.
The team took out piles of nets that were bigger than them! Thank you Cynthia, Andy, Robert and Michelle.
